From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7PS7-0007Rf-87 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:41:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7PS2-0005k3-62 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:40:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X7PS1-0005jp-Th for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:40:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:40:38 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20140716094038.4e6c17e9@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1405513086-31246-1-git-send-email-sebastian.tanase@openwide.fr> References: <1405513086-31246-1-git-send-email-sebastian.tanase@openwide.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V4 0/6] icount: Implement delay algorithm between guest and host clocks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sebastian Tanase Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, alex@alex.org.uk, wenchaoqemu@gmail.com, quintela@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, michael@walle.cc, camille.begue@openwide.fr, aliguori@amazon.com, crobinso@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:18:00 +0200 Sebastian Tanase wrote: > The icount option already implemented in QEMU allows the guest to run at a theoretical > frequency of 1/(2^N) GHz (N is the icount parameter). The goal of this patch is to have a > real guest frequency close to the one imposed by using the icount option. Is this really an RFC?