From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: add watermark event
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:39:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140801113940.GC7258@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404830964-10733-2-git-send-email-fromani@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2931 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 04:49:24PM +0200, Francesco Romani wrote:
> @@ -5813,3 +5815,57 @@ void bdrv_flush_io_queue(BlockDriverState *bs)
> bdrv_flush_io_queue(bs->file);
> }
> }
> +
> +static bool watermark_exceeded(BlockDriverState *bs,
> + int64_t sector_num,
> + int nb_sectors)
> +{
> +
> + if (bs->wr_watermark_perc > 0) {
> + int64_t watermark = (bs->total_sectors) / 100 * bs->wr_watermark_perc;
bs->total_sectors should not be used directly.
Have you considered making the watermark parameter take sector units
instead of a percentage?
I'm not sure whether a precentage makes sense because 25% of a 10GB
image is 2.5 GB so a 75% watermark might be reasonable. 25% of a 1 TB
image is 250 GB and that's probably not a reasonable watermark.
So let the block-set-watermark caller pass an absolute sector number
instead. It keeps things simple for both QEMU and thin provisioning
manager.
> + if (sector_num >= watermark) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int coroutine_fn watermark_before_write_notify(NotifierWithReturn *notifier,
> + void *opaque)
> +{
> + BdrvTrackedRequest *req = opaque;
> + int64_t sector_num = req->offset >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> + int nb_sectors = req->bytes >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +
> +/* FIXME: needed? */
> + assert((req->offset & (BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE - 1)) == 0);
> + assert((req->bytes & (BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE - 1)) == 0);
Not really needed here. Emulated storage controllers either get
requests in block units (i.e. they are automatically aligned) or check
them (like virtio-blk).
I guess there's no harm in checking, but I would drop it.
> +
> + if (watermark_exceeded(req->bs, sector_num, nb_sectors)) {
> + BlockDriverState *bs = req->bs;
> + qapi_event_send_block_watermark(
> + bdrv_get_device_name(bs),
> + sector_num,
> + bs->wr_highest_sector,
> + &error_abort);
How do you prevent flooding events if every write request exceeds the
watermark?
Perhaps the watermark should be disabled until block-set-watermark is
called again.
> + }
> +
> + return 0; /* should always let other notifiers run */
> +}
> +
> +void bdrv_set_watermark_perc(BlockDriverState *bs,
> + int watermark_perc)
> +{
> + NotifierWithReturn before_write = {
> + .notify = watermark_before_write_notify,
> + };
> +
> + if (watermark_perc <= 0) {
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (bs->wr_watermark_perc == 0) {
> + bdrv_add_before_write_notifier(bs, &before_write);
before_write must be a BlockDriverState field so it has the correct
lifetime. In this patch before_write is allocated on the stack and will
cause invalid memory accesses once we leave this function.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-08 14:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add watermark reporting for block devices Francesco Romani
2014-07-08 14:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: add watermark event Francesco Romani
2014-07-08 15:10 ` Eric Blake
2014-08-01 11:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-08-05 8:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-05 13:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-08 8:01 ` Francesco Romani
2014-08-08 12:51 ` Eric Blake
2014-07-08 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] add watermark reporting for block devices Francesco Romani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140801113940.GC7258@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=fromani@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).