qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: add watermark event
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:08:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140805130846.GA12251@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140805084757.GB4391@noname.str.redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1580 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 01.08.2014 um 13:39 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 04:49:24PM +0200, Francesco Romani wrote:
> > > @@ -5813,3 +5815,57 @@ void bdrv_flush_io_queue(BlockDriverState *bs)
> > >          bdrv_flush_io_queue(bs->file);
> > >      }
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +static bool watermark_exceeded(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > > +                               int64_t sector_num,
> > > +                               int nb_sectors)
> > > +{
> > > +
> > > +    if (bs->wr_watermark_perc > 0) {
> > > +        int64_t watermark = (bs->total_sectors) / 100 * bs->wr_watermark_perc;
> > 
> > bs->total_sectors should not be used directly.
> > 
> > Have you considered making the watermark parameter take sector units
> > instead of a percentage?
> > 
> > I'm not sure whether a precentage makes sense because 25% of a 10GB
> > image is 2.5 GB so a 75% watermark might be reasonable.  25% of a 1 TB
> > image is 250 GB and that's probably not a reasonable watermark.
> > 
> > So let the block-set-watermark caller pass an absolute sector number
> > instead.  It keeps things simple for both QEMU and thin provisioning
> > manager.
> 
> No sector numbers in external interfaces, please. These units of 512
> bytes are completely arbitrary and don't make any sense. I hope to get
> rid of BDRV_SECTOR_* eventually even internally.
> 
> So for external APIs, please use bytes instead.

I agree and forgot about that.  Please use bytes instead of sectors or a
percentage.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-05 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-08 14:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add watermark reporting for block devices Francesco Romani
2014-07-08 14:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: add watermark event Francesco Romani
2014-07-08 15:10   ` Eric Blake
2014-08-01 11:39   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-05  8:47     ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-05 13:08       ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-08-08  8:01         ` Francesco Romani
2014-08-08 12:51           ` Eric Blake
2014-07-08 14:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] add watermark reporting for block devices Francesco Romani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140805130846.GA12251@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
    --to=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=fromani@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).