From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFTKx-0007NM-5R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:26:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFTKs-0003h6-Lv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:26:55 -0400 Received: from static.92.5.9.176.clients.your-server.de ([176.9.5.92]:54968 helo=mail.hallyn.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XFTKs-0003h2-Bl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:26:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 21:26:49 +0200 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Message-ID: <20140807192649.GA10037@mail.hallyn.com> References: <1406920333-8297-1-git-send-email-alex@alex.org.uk> <20140807025046.GB18303@ubuntumail> <6AF1AF51-36D9-4939-9184-AA555A043AFE@alex.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6AF1AF51-36D9-4939-9184-AA555A043AFE@alex.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add machine type pc-1.0-qemu-kvm for live migrate compatibility with qemu-kvm List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Bligh Cc: Ryan Harper , Serge Hallyn , "quintela@redhat.com" , Libvirt , Serge Hallyn , Alexander Graf , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Cole Robinson , Amit Shah , Bruce Rogers , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , "Serge E. Hallyn" Quoting Alex Bligh (alex@alex.org.uk): > Serge, > > On 7 Aug 2014, at 03:50, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > This worked for me when migrating by hand. I'm trying to make it work > > through libvirt, using the following patch. (So whether to have > > pc-1.0 be treated as qemu's or qemu-kvm's pc-1.0 is specifed using a > > boolean in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf) Qemu starts with decent > > looking args, but for some reason the the migration is failing - > > still looking through the logfile to figure out why. > > Are you using exactly the same arguments by hand and with libvirt? > > Also, on reflection, given one of the changes between 1.0 and 2.0 > is ACPI, I should probably have done some testing with an ACPI > enabled image, rather than just cirros (which not ACPI enabled); > any chance this is ACPI related? A-ha, acpi wasn't a problem. I actually had a general migration problem even when coming from other utopic hosts. With that fixed, I've got successful migration from qemu-kvm 1.0 in precise to a utopic host. -serge