From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHA4K-0001zH-4a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:16:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHA4E-00010o-0t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:16:44 -0400 Received: from [58.251.49.30] (port=56378 helo=mail.sangfor.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHA4D-0000zb-M2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:16:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail.sangfor.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sangfor.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A4817C00F7 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:05:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail.sangfor.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sangfor.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaG4WODut1rj for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:05:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from vv-PC (unknown [10.10.6.254]) by mail.sangfor.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E2E5217C0103 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:04:56 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:14:34 +0800 From: "Zhang Haoyu" Message-ID: <201408121914328781570@sangfor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [question] which version of seabios is best for qemu-2.0.0? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Hi all, We choose qemu-2.0.0 as distribution, and which version of seabios is best for qemu-2.0.0 ? Thanks, Zhang Haoyu