From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHsPQ-0000Av-W8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:37:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHsPK-0001nP-4F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:37:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:37:18 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140814103718.GJ31346@redhat.com> References: <1408001361-13580-1-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> <1408001361-13580-4-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1408001361-13580-4-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/10] virtio-blk: fix reference a pointer which might be freed List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: zhanghailiang Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lkurusa@redhat.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, riku.voipio@iki.fi, mjt@tls.msk.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, luonengjun@huawei.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, alex.bennee@linaro.org, rth@twiddle.net On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:29:14PM +0800, zhanghailiang wrote: > In function virtio_blk_handle_request, it may freed memory pointed by req, > So do not access member of req after calling this function. > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Stefan want to pick up this one? > --- > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > index c241c50..54a853a 100644 > --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c > @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_output(VirtIODevice *vdev, VirtQueue *vq) > static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) > { > VirtIOBlock *s = opaque; > - VirtIOBlockReq *req = s->rq; > + VirtIOBlockReq *req = s->rq, *next = NULL; > MultiReqBuffer mrb = { > .num_writes = 0, > }; > @@ -469,8 +469,9 @@ static void virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh(void *opaque) > s->rq = NULL; > > while (req) { > + next = req->next; > virtio_blk_handle_request(req, &mrb); > - req = req->next; > + req = next; > } > > virtio_submit_multiwrite(s->bs, &mrb); > -- > 1.7.12.4 >