From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHtRx-0002CK-P0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:44:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHtRr-0007fV-Jx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:44:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XHtRr-0007fR-CC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 07:44:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:44:34 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140814114434.GA24166@redhat.com> References: <1407740702-4086-1-git-send-email-tamlokveer@gmail.com> <1407740702-4086-4-git-send-email-tamlokveer@gmail.com> <20140814110652.GQ31346@redhat.com> <53EC9F51.7050304@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53EC9F51.7050304@web.de> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/5] intel-iommu: add DMAR table to ACPI tables List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Stefan Weil , Knut Omang , Le Tan , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex Williamson , Anthony Liguori , Paolo Bonzini On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:36:49PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2014-08-14 13:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:05:00PM +0800, Le Tan wrote: > >> Expose Intel IOMMU to the BIOS. If object of TYPE_INTEL_IOMMU_DEVICE exists, > >> add DMAR table to ACPI RSDT table. For now the DMAR table indicates that there > >> is only one hardware unit without INTR_REMAP capability on the platform. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Le Tan > > > > Could you add a unit test please? > > While unit tests would really be helpful, I'm afraid that's not in reach > (GSoC is almost over). How much time is left BTW? > The good news is that we have pretty broad test > coverage with both Linux and also Jailhouse already. > > Do you see unit tests as precondition for merging the series? > > Jan > >