From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJOgr-00030L-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:17:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJOgm-0004Ju-Ig for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:17:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJOgm-0004Jc-AM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:17:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:17:33 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20140818111733.65709fa8@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87bnrhq1eb.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> References: <87bnrhq1eb.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Tracing HMP commands List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?TGx1w61z?= Vilanova Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:10:36 +0200 Llu=C3=ADs Vilanova wrote: > Hi! I've been writing some QAPI/QMP commands to control tracing state, an= d I was > wondering if the HMP commands (trace-event, trace-file and trace-events) = can be > dropped, or whether I should adapt them to the new ones. As far as compatibility is concerned, there's no problem dropping them as they don't exist in QMP. So, this is more a question of deciding what's the best API for tracing.