From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJNEJ-0003oZ-Kj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:44:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XJNEF-0004mQ-AB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:44:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:44:21 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140818134421.GA28795@redhat.com> References: <1408348473-10104-1-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> <53F1E5A4.9060000@msgid.tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53F1E5A4.9060000@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v7] tests/bios-tables-test: check the value returned by fopen() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: zhanghailiang , marcel.a@redhat.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Li Liu , luonengjun@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:38:12PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 18.08.2014 11:54, zhanghailiang wrote: > > The function fopen() may fail, so check its return value. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang > > Signed-off-by: Li Liu > > Reviewed-by: Alex Benn=E9e > > --- > > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >=20 > > diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c > > index 045eb27..feb3b58 100644 > > --- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c > > +++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c > > @@ -790,6 +790,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > > const char *arch =3D qtest_get_arch(); > > FILE *f =3D fopen(disk, "w"); > > int ret; > > + > > + if (!f) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Couldn't open \"%s\": %s", disk, strerror(e= rrno)); > > + return -1; > > + } >=20 > Applied to -trivial, with s/-1/1/. No need to resend it again. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > /mjt >=20 > > fwrite(boot_sector, 1, sizeof boot_sector, f); > > fclose(f); > > =20 > >=20 This doesn't seem appropriate to trivial tree: there were some objections from Marcel, I'd like to see them addressed.