From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: "M.Kustova" <maxa@catit.be>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] image-fuzzer: Trivial readability and formatting improvements
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:13:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140822101302.GC11330@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALKf6DG=LX+T7-+_jWDc-yg-N1M9UtU4KE42aSc4y+RjWQ9-xA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1818 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 01:50:27PM +0400, M.Kustova wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 02:00:24AM +0400, Maria Kustova wrote:
> >> diff --git a/tests/image-fuzzer/qcow2/fuzz.py b/tests/image-fuzzer/qcow2/fuzz.py
> >> index 6e272c6..c652dc9 100644
> >> --- a/tests/image-fuzzer/qcow2/fuzz.py
> >> +++ b/tests/image-fuzzer/qcow2/fuzz.py
> >> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ def string_validator(current, strings):
> >> return validator(current, random.choice, strings)
> >>
> >>
> >> -def selector(current, constraints, validate=int_validator):
> >> +def selector(current, constraints, validate=None):
> >> """Select one value from all defined by constraints.
> >>
> >> Each constraint produces one random value satisfying to it. The function
> >> @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ def selector(current, constraints, validate=int_validator):
> >> constraints overlaps).
> >> """
> >>
> >> + if validate is None:
> >> + validate = int_validator
> >> +
> >> def iter_validate(c):
> >> """Apply validate() only to constraints represented as lists.
> >>
> >
> > I don't understand the benefit of this change. The default initializer
> > syntax did what was intended, now it has been made more complicated with
> > a None value that gets converted to int_validator later.
>
> It's a convention rule that allows keep the function signature
> unchanged in case of modified function internals.
> In other words, wrapper functions should not change in response of the
> internal function change.
I don't think that is necessary. This is not a stable API that cannot
change.
Also, what exactly creates an API commitment here? Hiding int_validator
doesn't hide anything.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-22 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-18 22:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] image-fuzzer: Trivial readability and formatting improvements Maria Kustova
2014-08-19 9:38 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-19 9:50 ` M.Kustova
2014-08-22 10:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-08-19 9:44 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-19 9:55 ` M.Kustova
2014-08-19 10:57 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-08-19 16:04 ` M.Kustova
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140822101302.GC11330@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=maxa@catit.be \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).