From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53683) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKof4-0001d1-KJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:13:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKoey-0007Tt-Fr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:13:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKoey-0007TI-8P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:13:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:13:31 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20140822131331.GN32377@noname.redhat.com> References: <20140728084846.GH31917@G08FNSTD100614.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> <20140822122556.GJ14001@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140822122556.GJ14001@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v12 0/6] qcow2, raw: add preallocation=full and preallocation=falloc List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: Hu Tao , Max Reitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Yasunori Goto Am 22.08.2014 um 14:25 hat Richard W.M. Jones geschrieben: > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:48:46PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > > ping... > > > > All the 6 patches have reviewed-by now. > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 02:09:57PM +0800, Hu Tao wrote: > > > This series adds two preallocation mode to qcow2 and raw: > > > > > > Option preallocation=full preallocates disk space for image by writing > > > zeros to disk, this ensures disk space in any cases. > > > > > > Option preallocation=falloc preallocates disk space by calling > > > posix_fallocate(). This is faster than preallocation=full. > > Sorry if this was discussed before, but why would anyone use > preallocation=full if preallocation=falloc was possible? > > Shouldn't preallocation=full simply use posix_fallocate if it's > available, and fall back to writing zeroes if not? posix_fallocate() is basically metadata preallocation on the file system level. If any lower levels involve allocations as well, does posix_fallocate() allocate them there? Kevin