From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKoo6-000583-2u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:23:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKonz-0001tk-Tr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:23:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKonz-0001tg-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:22:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:22:53 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20140822132253.GB14126@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <20140822082735.GA3129@gandi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140822082735.GA3129@gandi.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] adding a parameter in qemu tap option List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: William Dauchy Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:27:35AM +0200, William Dauchy wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm trying to understand how to add a parameter in tap option. >=20 > I currently have a working config for a vm; i.e several interfaces using > multiqueues. > I had a try with: >=20 > --- a/qapi-schema.json > +++ b/qapi-schema.json > =A0-2006,6 +2008,7 @@ > =A0## > =A0{ 'type': 'NetdevTapOptions', > =A0 =A0'data': { > + =A0 =A0'*foo': =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'str', > =A0 =A0 =A0'*ifname': =A0 =A0 'str', > =A0 =A0 =A0'*fd': =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 'str', > =A0 =A0 =A0'*fds': =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0'str', >=20 > i.e just adding a foo parameter; nothing change in my config file (I'm > using -readconfig option and not cmdline) > multiqueue is no longer working in some cases. >=20 > I don't get how is it possible. I don't even understand why I don't have > the same behaviour using the cmdline. >=20 > Maybe I forgot something obvious. > Does someone has some hints? I don't see any obvious reason from the small diff you have posted. Are you sure this is the only change you've made and the environment is unchanged? Stefan --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT90QtAAoJEJykq7OBq3PI9GQIAIuQmlsGKJ+OzzHb7yvmbwNt JCFTL4TD4KA4fvZOMUWNgfTy1/p8G4JdR3HDS4ZBEJULrIS3DWnzq1DMCcn0Ifz5 0KKaMlf3KSOHL4WEogvNuyocvP1iGn6T5ndmJv5TiThr4ybPBUhCQV9VrIdjpyjD x4oMf0zmKeBBC2u4fLBycHYHQrIQeO2i8KnSrYrLuajI8Z5gPH/gvGl9oU1PavCa 2uiKe1fhSo656Z1vZUnVRTRf1GaeJbwktgn4XXvz/vEj/dGU0dXV/bt+xKx4fexE 2W0HpCVA8G70U0FxkaZg2rFWxv6kOwq7H3PneNFhSPQAC+9u9rCzyEu6IzUg2rw= =CiUp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW--