From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] dma: Implement .cancel_async
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:21:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140826092143.GA30816@T430.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53FC496C.7020603@redhat.com>
On Tue, 08/26 10:46, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 26/08/2014 08:08, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> > + if (dbs->cancelled) {
> > + ret = -ECANCELED;
> > + }
>
> Why is dbs->cancelled necessary?
Request may complete after bdrv_aio_cancel_async with other status, this flag
is checked to fix the status to -ECANCELED.
>
> > dma_bdrv_unmap(dbs);
> > if (dbs->common.cb) {
> > dbs->common.cb(dbs->common.opaque, ret);
> > @@ -141,6 +148,9 @@ static void dma_bdrv_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
> >
> > trace_dma_bdrv_cb(dbs, ret);
> >
> > + if (dbs->cancelled) {
> > + ret = -ECANCELED;
> > + }
> > dbs->acb = NULL;
> > dbs->sector_num += dbs->iov.size / 512;
> >
> > @@ -185,6 +195,7 @@ static void dma_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *acb)
> >
> > trace_dma_aio_cancel(dbs);
> >
> > + dbs->cancelled = true;
> > if (dbs->acb) {
> > BlockDriverAIOCB *acb = dbs->acb;
> > dbs->acb = NULL;
> > @@ -196,9 +207,25 @@ static void dma_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *acb)
> > dma_complete(dbs, 0);
> > }
> >
> > +static void dma_aio_cancel_async(BlockDriverAIOCB *acb)
> > +{
> > + DMAAIOCB *dbs = container_of(acb, DMAAIOCB, common);
> > +
> > + trace_dma_aio_cancel(dbs);
> > +
> > + dbs->cancelled = true;
> > + if (dbs->acb) {
> > + acb = dbs->acb;
> > + dbs->acb = NULL;
>
> Why do you need to set dbs->acb to NULL, since the callback is going to
> be called?
Just copied from dma_aio_cancel, but seems not particularly useful. It reminds
me that the one in dma_aio_cancel also looks suspicious.
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-26 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-26 6:08 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/8] block: Asynchronous request cancellation Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 1/8] block: Add refcnt in BlockDriverAIOCB Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] block: Add bdrv_aio_cancel_async Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] tests: Add testing code for bdrv_aio_cancel_async Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 4/8] linux-aio: Implement .cancel_async Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] thread-pool: " Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 8:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-26 9:26 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 6/8] dma: " Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 8:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-26 9:21 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2014-08-26 9:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] block: Implement bdrv_em_co_aiocb_info.cancel_async Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 6:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 8/8] iscsi: Implement .cancel_async in acb info Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140826092143.GA30816@T430.nay.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).