From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Benoit Canet <benoit@irqsave.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/5] qemu-iotests: Add 093 for IO throttling
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:50:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140826135041.GF11279@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401958066-22118-6-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3605 bytes --]
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 04:47:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> + def setUp(self):
> + qemu_img('create', '-f', iotests.imgfmt, test_img, "1G")
> + #self.vm = iotests.VM().add_drive(test_img, "bps=1024,bps_max=1")
Commented out lines should be dropped
> + self.vm = iotests.VM().add_drive(test_img)
> + self.vm.launch()
> +
> + def tearDown(self):
> + self.vm.shutdown()
> + os.remove(test_img)
> +
> + def do_test_throttle(self, seconds=10, **limits):
> + def check_limit(limit, num):
> + # IO throttling algorithm is discrete, allow 10% error so the test
> + # is more deterministic
> + return limit == 0 or num < seconds * limit * 1.1
> +
> + nsec_per_sec = 1000000000
> +
> + limits['bps_max'] = 1
> + limits['iops_max'] = 1
> +
> + # Enqueue many requests to throttling queue
This comment is wrong, it actually happens further down
> + result = self.vm.qmp("block_set_io_throttle", conv_keys=False, **limits)
> + self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {})
> +
> + # Set vm clock to a known value
> + ns = nsec_per_sec
> + self.vm.qtest_cmd("clock_step %d" % ns)
> +
> + # Append many requests into the throttle queue
> + # They drain bps_max and iops_max
> + # The rest requests won't get executed until qtest clock is driven
> + for i in range(1000):
> + self.vm.hmp_qemu_io("drive0", "aio_read -a -q 0 512")
> + self.vm.hmp_qemu_io("drive0", "aio_write -a -q 0 512")
> +
> + start_rd_bytes, start_rd_iops, start_wr_bytes, start_wr_iops = self.blockstats('drive0')
> +
> + ns += seconds * nsec_per_sec
> + self.vm.qtest_cmd("clock_step %d" % ns)
> + # wait for a while to let requests take off
> + time.sleep(1)
This is not a reliable testing approach. If the system is under heavy
load maybe only a few requests completed. We don't know whether that is
due to I/O throttling or not.
A reliable test would not perform real disk I/O so the test is
independent of disk/system speed. And it would not use time.sleep(1) to
"wait" since there is no guarantee that anything happened in the
meantime.
Do you think this can be improved?
> + end_rd_bytes, end_rd_iops, end_wr_bytes, end_wr_iops = self.blockstats('drive0')
> +
> + rd_bytes = end_rd_bytes - start_rd_bytes
> + rd_iops = end_rd_iops - start_rd_iops
> + wr_bytes = end_wr_bytes - start_wr_bytes
> + wr_iops = end_wr_iops - start_wr_iops
> +
> + assert check_limit(limits['bps'], rd_bytes)
> + assert check_limit(limits['bps_rd'], rd_bytes)
> + assert check_limit(limits['bps'], wr_bytes)
> + assert check_limit(limits['bps_wr'], wr_bytes)
> + assert check_limit(limits['iops'], rd_iops)
> + assert check_limit(limits['iops_rd'], rd_iops)
> + assert check_limit(limits['iops'], wr_iops)
> + assert check_limit(limits['iops_wr'], wr_iops)
Please use TestCase.assert*() methods instead of plain assert. They
produce humand-readable error messages including the failing values.
> +
> + def test_bps(self):
> + self.do_test_throttle(**{
> + 'device': 'drive0',
> + 'bps': 1000,
> + 'bps_rd': 0,
> + 'bps_wr': 0,
> + 'iops': 0,
> + 'iops_rd': 0,
> + 'iops_wr': 0,
> + })
Keyword argument syntax is more concise:
self.do_test_throttle(device='drive0',
bps=1000,
bps_rd=0,
...)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-26 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-05 8:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] This series adds iotest case for IO throttling Fam Zheng
2014-06-05 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/5] qemu-io: Account IO by aio_read and aio_write Fam Zheng
2014-06-05 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] qtest: Add scripts/qtest/qtest.py Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 13:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-27 3:12 ` Fam Zheng
2014-06-05 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] qemu-iotests: Add VM method qtest() to iotests.py Fam Zheng
2014-06-05 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/5] qemu-iotests: Allow caller to disable underscore convertion for qmp Fam Zheng
2014-06-05 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/5] qemu-iotests: Add 093 for IO throttling Fam Zheng
2014-08-26 13:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2014-08-27 6:19 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-27 8:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-06-17 2:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] This series adds iotest case " Fam Zheng
2014-07-31 7:29 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140826135041.GF11279@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=benoit@irqsave.net \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).