From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] What tests should "make check-block" run?
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:22:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828152231.GA11815@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140828110556.GH26741@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:05:56PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:16:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 21 August 2014 14:12, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:27:00PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >> Should we have a variant of "make check-block" for testing other
> > >> (format, protocol) combinations?
> > >
> > > I don't think variants are useful. If you need control, use ./check.
> >
> > That seems pretty undiscoverable to me. I know about 'make check',
> > and 'make check-help' tells me about 'make check-block', but how
> > do I find out about 'check' ? I just had to bounce through the makefile
> > and a wrapper script to even figure out which directory it lives in,
> > and there's no help text or usage comments in it...
>
> http://qemu-project.org/Documentation/QemuIoTests
>
> Any suggestions for making it more discoverable?
>
A couple of suggestions:
1.) Add a README file to the 'tests' directory
2.) Make the 'tests' directory more hierarchical. It is not obvious
that 'qemu-iotests' (and the other tests) are something different than
the giant ball of .c files that is also in the tests directory. I
think it would be ideal to have the 'tests' directory contain 2 files
(Makefile, README), and then sub-directories.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 12:27 [Qemu-devel] What tests should "make check-block" run? Markus Armbruster
2014-08-21 12:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-08-21 13:00 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2014-08-22 5:01 ` Fam Zheng
2014-08-21 14:38 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-08-21 13:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-21 13:16 ` Peter Maydell
2014-08-28 11:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-08-28 15:22 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2014-08-28 15:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-08-28 16:19 ` Peter Maydell
2014-08-29 20:05 ` Max Reitz
2014-09-01 7:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-08-28 23:50 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140828152231.GA11815@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).