From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51651) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZZp-0003k1-Ch for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:08:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZZh-00047u-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:08:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPZZh-00047k-Jw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:07:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 19:11:05 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140904161105.GA21452@redhat.com> References: <1407349101-27793-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20140822193524.GC12310@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20140824111607.GD9561@redhat.com> <53FB2192.9020501@redhat.com> <20140904150853.GA4756@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> <20140904152901.GA21201@redhat.com> <20140904153413.GB8481@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140904153413.GB8481@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND 0/2] Fix leaks on object_property_add_str() setters List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:34:13PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:01PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:08:53PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 01:44:18PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > Il 24/08/2014 13:16, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > > Are these appropriate for 2.1.1? > > > > > Add Cc stable? > > > > > > > > I think so. > > > > > > I agree it can go to -stable, but just getting it applied to master is > > > being difficult enough. :( > > > > > > Repeating my question from 2 weeks ago: who can apply these? > > > > I applied 2/2, 1/2 is no longer needed IIUC? > > It is still needed. The "similar patch" Amos mentioned (commit > 5e490b6a504912225dff0e520e1c6af68295d238) is actually the one that > introduces the bug I am fixing (I just didn't use git-revert because I > wasn't aware of that commit). OK will apply as revert. > -- > Eduardo