From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
To: Hani Benhabiles <kroosec@gmail.com>
Cc: nbd-generic@lists.sf.net, libvir-list@redhat.com,
mprivozn@redhat.com, nick@bytemark.co.uk, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
w@uter.be
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] NBD TLS support in QEMU
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:26:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140905132608.GB26974@grep.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140905084618.GA3720@Inspiron-3521>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:46:18AM +0100, Hani Benhabiles wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 05:44:17PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > QEMU offers both NBD client and server functionality. The NBD protocol
> > runs unencrypted, which is a problem when the client and server
> > communicate over an untrusted network.
> >
> > The particular use case that prompted this mail is storage migration in
> > OpenStack. The goal is to encrypt the NBD connection between source and
> > destination hosts during storage migration.
> >
> > I think we can integrate TLS into the NBD protocol as an optional flag.
> > A quick web search does not reveal existing open source SSL/TLS NBD
> > implementations. I do see a VMware NBDSSL protocol but there is no
> > specification so I guess it is proprietary.
>
> Not sold on this because:
> - It requires (unnecessary) changes to the NBD specification.
They may not be necessary from a libvirt/qemu point of view, but I've
had requests to implement encryption from other people, too. So while
they're not very high on my priority list, I do think the changes are
necessary.
> - It would still be vulnerable to a protocol downgrade attack: ie. An attacker
> could strip the TLS flag from the server's response resulting in either:
> * Connection fallback to cleartext, if both ends don't force TLS.
> * Loss of backward compatibility, if one of the ends forces TLS, making the
> reason for which such a flag is added moot IIUC.
Tunneling the entire protocol inside an SSL connection doesn't fix that;
if an attacker is able to hijack your TCP connections and change flags,
then this attacker is also able to hijack your TCP connection and
redirect it to a decrypting/encrypting proxy.
I agree that preventing a possible SSL downgrade attack (and other forms
of MITM) should be high on the priority list, but "tunnel the whole
thing in SSL" doesn't do that.
[...]
--
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-03 16:44 [Qemu-devel] NBD TLS support in QEMU Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-04 14:19 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-04 14:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Daniel P. Berrange
2014-09-04 15:04 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-04 15:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-04 15:54 ` John Snow
2014-09-04 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-04 22:54 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-05 8:42 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-05 12:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-04 22:02 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-05 8:13 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-09-05 8:34 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-09-05 12:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-05 6:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Michal Privoznik
2014-09-05 8:10 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-09-05 8:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Hani Benhabiles
2014-09-05 12:31 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-05 13:26 ` Wouter Verhelst [this message]
2014-10-01 20:23 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-02 11:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-02 13:50 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-08 18:16 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-09 12:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-02 11:05 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-02 11:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-10-17 22:03 ` [Qemu-devel] spec, RFC: TLS support for NBD Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-18 6:33 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-10-20 7:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-20 9:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-10-20 11:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-10-20 11:56 ` Florian Weimer
2014-10-20 12:48 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-10-20 22:10 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-21 9:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-21 18:02 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-20 12:08 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2014-10-20 21:53 ` [Qemu-devel] spec, RFC: TLS support for NBDµ Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-21 8:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-10-21 18:30 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-25 10:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] " Wouter Verhelst
2014-10-30 10:40 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-10-31 18:15 ` Wouter Verhelst
2014-11-03 14:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140905132608.GB26974@grep.be \
--to=wouter@grep.be \
--cc=kroosec@gmail.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd-generic@lists.sf.net \
--cc=nick@bytemark.co.uk \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=w@uter.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).