Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/17] COLO ctl: implement colo checkpoint protocol

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Hongyang Yang (yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> 
> 
> ??? 08/01/2014 11:03 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ??????:
> >* Yang Hongyang (yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:

<snip>

> >>+static int do_colo_transaction(MigrationState *s, QEMUFile *control,
> >>+                               QEMUFile *trans)
> >>+{
> >>+    int ret;
> >>+
> >>+    ret = colo_ctl_put(s->file, COLO_CHECKPOINT_NEW);
> >>+    if (ret) {
> >>+        goto out;
> >>+    }
> >>+
> >>+    ret = colo_ctl_get(control, COLO_CHECKPOINT_SUSPENDED);
> >
> >What happens at this point if the slave just doesn't respond?
> >(i.e. the socket doesn't drop - you just don't get the byte).
> 
> If the socket return bytes that were not expected, exit. If
> socket return error, do some cleanup and quit COLO process.
> refer to: colo_ctl_get() and colo_ctl_get_value()

But what happens if the slave just doesn't respond at all; e.g.
if the slave host loses power, it'll take a while (many seconds)
before the socket will timeout.

Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK