qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] migration: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:141: qemu_co_mutex_unlock: Assertion `mutex->locked == 1' failed
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:52:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140916125223.GC4886@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54182EAE.4000802@redhat.com>

Am 16.09.2014 um 14:35 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 16/09/2014 14:34, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> > I think bdrv_invalidate_cache() really needs to call bdrv_drain_all()
> > before starting to reopen stuff. There could be requests in flight
> > without holding the lock and if you can indeed reopen their BDS under
> > their feet without breaking things (I doubt it), that would be pure
> > luck.
> 
> But even that's not enough without a lock if .bdrv_invalidate_cache (the
> callback) is called from a coroutine.  As soon as it yields, another
> request can come in, for example from the NBD server.

Yes, that's true. We can't fix this problem in qcow2, though, because
it's a more general one.  I think we must make sure that
bdrv_invalidate_cache() doesn't yield.

Either by forbidding to run bdrv_invalidate_cache() in a coroutine and
moving the problem to the caller (where and why is it even called from a
coroutine?), or possibly by creating a new coroutine for the driver
callback and running that in a nested event loop that only handles
bdrv_invalidate_cache() callbacks, so that the NBD server doesn't get a
chance to process new requests in this thread.

Forbidding to run in a coroutine sounds easier, but I don't see yet
which caller would have to be fixed.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-16 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-15 10:50 [Qemu-devel] migration: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:141: qemu_co_mutex_unlock: Assertion `mutex->locked == 1' failed Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-16 12:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-16 12:10   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 12:34     ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-16 12:35       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-16 12:52         ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2014-09-16 12:59           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-19  8:47             ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-23  8:47               ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] qcow2: Fix race in cache invalidation Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-24  7:30                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-24  9:48                 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25  8:41                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-25  8:57                     ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25  9:55                       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-25 10:20                         ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25 12:29                           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-25 12:39                             ` Kevin Wolf
2014-09-25 14:05                               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-28 11:14                                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17  6:46       ` [Qemu-devel] migration: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:141: qemu_co_mutex_unlock: Assertion `mutex->locked == 1' failed Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-16 14:52     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17  9:06     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-17  9:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-17 13:44         ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17 15:07           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-18  3:26             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-18  9:56               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-19  8:23                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-09-17 15:04         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-09-17 15:17           ` Eric Blake
2014-09-17 15:53           ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140916125223.GC4886@noname.str.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).