From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTw8y-0002tP-EW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:02:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTw8r-00021T-2f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:02:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTw8q-00020q-RC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:02:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:42:26 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20140916164225.GA8628@redhat.com> References: <1410882204-9836-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <54186401.9040705@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54186401.9040705@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests: use g_test_trap_fork for glib between 2.16 and 2.38 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , Eduardo Habkost On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 16/09/2014 18:20, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > >> > - bumping the minimum required version from 2.12 to 2.16. I suggest > >> > bumping to the currently required version for Windows, which is 2.20 > >> > (released March 2009). > > The commit message for a52d28afb suggests that this bump would be > > dropping support for RHEL5. That doesn't seem like a great idea > > to me, especially if it's only for the benefit of a test program. > > Though you would just drop support for "make check" on RHEL5. Even > "make -k check" would roughly work. Probably not too hard to drop the specific test, right? > > On the other hand your patch doesn't actually bump the required > > version, so I'm a bit confused. > > Yeah, this is just an RFC. > > Paolo Message in the glib header hints at some reliability problems with g_test_fork. Any idea what these might be?