From: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@nodalink.com>
To: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@nodalink.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:08:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140929160846.GD26702@nodalink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411412452-8655-1-git-send-email-benoit.canet@nodalink.com>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:00:50PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
> in v2:
> Added a base parameters [Kevin]
> Remove multiple blockers [Kevin]
>
> Addressed Kevin's comments except BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE relaxing
> and "You need to unblock all of the BDSes that are going to be removed.
> Aren't you unblocking more than that here?".
>
>
> pass ./check -qcow2
>
> Benoît Canet (2):
> block: Rename BLOCK_OP_TYPE_REPLACE to BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE
> block: Make op blockers recursive
>
> block-migration.c | 4 +-
> block.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> block/blkverify.c | 21 ++++++++
> block/commit.c | 2 +
> block/mirror.c | 26 +++++++---
> block/quorum.c | 29 +++++++++++
> block/stream.c | 2 +
> block/vmdk.c | 32 ++++++++++++
> blockjob.c | 6 +--
> include/block/block.h | 14 ++++--
> include/block/block_int.h | 10 ++++
> 11 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Hello people,
Gentle ping,
I would really like these patches to get rev-by and merged for the next release
since they actually fix QEMU.
Under the new rule of code review I choose Markus or Jeff to do the initial
revision.
I could nag Kevin into reviewing it but it's not the process anymore.
Best regards
Benoît
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-22 19:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers Benoît Canet
2014-09-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] block: Rename BLOCK_OP_TYPE_REPLACE to BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE Benoît Canet
2014-09-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] block: Make op blockers recursive Benoît Canet
2014-10-01 4:38 ` Jeff Cody
2014-10-01 4:59 ` Benoît Canet
2014-10-01 9:29 ` Benoît Canet
2014-10-01 15:19 ` Jeff Cody
2014-10-01 15:42 ` Benoît Canet
2014-09-29 16:08 ` Benoît Canet [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-22 12:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers Benoît Canet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140929160846.GD26702@nodalink.com \
--to=benoit.canet@nodalink.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).