From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgDp5-0003l5-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:20:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgDoy-0000WD-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:20:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgDoy-0000W2-HQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 10:20:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:23:56 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20141020142356.GD11062@redhat.com> References: <1413797938-18100-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <877fzvq87z.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] intel_iommu: fix VTD_SID_TO_BUS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Le Tan Cc: Jan Kiszka , Markus Armbruster , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel WRT intel_iommu, it does not yet seem to be as fully functional as I hoped. People also discussed the best way to handle virtio versus iommu (it bypasses it ATM). I'd like to suggest we hide the iommu from the command line help for 2.2, this way people don't activate it mistakenly. Let's make it more complete and then enable for 2.3. Thoughts? -- MST