From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XghuN-00050A-Fz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:28:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XghuF-0006mj-Qq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:28:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XghuF-0006lo-GS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:27:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:31:29 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20141021223129.GD18051@redhat.com> References: <1413796790-30579-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <20141020141548.GA11062@redhat.com> <544556A1.3020405@redhat.com> <87r3y1tukp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r3y1tukp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Default to --no-git-fallback List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Paolo Bonzini , QEMU Developers , Peter Maydell On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:34:46PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Paolo Bonzini writes: > > > On 10/20/2014 04:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> What do you want to happen in this case? > >> Won't this cause even more patches to fall to the floor? > >> > >> The benefit seems marginal, the risk high. > > > > I agree with Michael. > > > > Can we detect if get_maintainer.pl is invoked as a cccmd, and in this > > case default to --no-git-fallback? If it is invoked manually, I would > > like to show the committers (I will then cherry pick the right ones). > > I don't like context-sensitive defaults. Too much magic. > > What about this: if get_maintainer.pl comes up empty, it points you to > --git-fallback. This is exactly what it's doing now :)