From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgt6E-0001XD-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:25:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgt68-0001RB-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:25:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4053) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgt68-0001Ql-BS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:24:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:28:27 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20141022102827.GA9949@redhat.com> References: <1413968902-24094-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20141022121747.4b445512@oc7435384737.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141022121747.4b445512@oc7435384737.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] small improvements to get_maintainer.pl List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:17:47PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:08:18 +0200 > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > See individual patches. My Perl-fu is limited, but the individual > > changes are easy enough. > > > > Paolo Bonzini (4): > > get_maintainer.pl: exit with status 1 if no maintainer found > > get_maintainer.pl: treat all M entries the same > > get_maintainer.pl: move git loop under "if ($email) {" > > get_maintainer.pl: point at --git-fallback instead of enabling it > > automatically > > > > scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 52 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > I think these are good patches ... but while you're at it, I wonder > whether you should/could also replace the entry for "penguin_chief" in > that file. It still points to Linus Torvalds - but I assume he does not > like to be bothered with patches related to QEMU... ? > > Thomas Let's just drop this flag. -- MST