From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhvL0-0002Hz-5I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:00:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhvKu-0001Ln-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:00:33 -0400 Received: from [58.251.49.30] (port=35628 helo=mail.sangfor.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhvKu-0001LG-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:00:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 15:00:09 +0800 From: "Zhang Haoyu" Message-ID: <201410251500076342482@sangfor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [question] How is the progress of optimizing qcow2_check_metadata_overlap() with reagard to cpu overhead? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz Hi, Max How is the progress of optimizing qcow2_check_metadata_overlap? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/127037/focus=127364 Thanks, Zhang Haoyu