From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37301)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1XleU9-000571-Up
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:49:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1XleU3-0004Tv-EX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:49:25 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40255)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1XleU3-0004TZ-3w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:49:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:49:13 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20141104134913.GA31288@redhat.com>
References: <1414947218-7618-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<87bnoouxqn.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<20141103151955.GA14401@redhat.com>
	<87egtkuusk.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<CAFEAcA9XO4A9qC8QK=hB1Nw5nUUT=Oh+P6ZvNUw2z2FxWHhVUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141103163504.GA31060@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA9XL5JeYZtAniJ=Ei2-JE0UGmSA-zoTMo8s=kxY1RX8nQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9XL5JeYZtAniJ=Ei2-JE0UGmSA-zoTMo8s=kxY1RX8nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-char: fix tcp_get_fds
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:17:29AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 November 2014 16:35, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > OK I backed that patch out and re-pushed.
> > As other patches are unchanged, I don't want to re-do the pull
> > request, it's just spam on list.
> >
> > Tag name is still for_upstream, new hash
> > d43f0d641e366251bd9c63005241775f672bf3ec
> 
> OK, thanks; I've applied this. You can always just send
> the cover letter again in this sort of situation, by the way.
> (PS: if you can change either the commit message or the tag
> name on a respin to indicate which version of a pullreq it is
> it helps me be certain I have the right one.)
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM

OK, will do that if this happens again.