From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fixed mismatch of error-handling between pci_qdev_init() and qdev
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:28:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141105132815.GA4884@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545A23A7.7090401@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:18:31PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/11/2014 14:16, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 07:11:51PM +0900, SeokYeon Hwang wrote:
> >>> pci_qdev_init() checks whether return value is 0 or not to figure
> >>> out pci device is initialized successfully. Otherwise,
> >>> device_realize() in qdev checks that return value is negative value
> >>> to figure out the device is realized successfully.
> >>> When pci device returns positive number, pci_qdev_init() thinks that
> >>> error is occured and makes the device unregistered. Nevertheless,
> >>> qdev thinks that device is realized.
> >>> Finally, crash is occured by commands like 'qtree' that traverse qdev list.
> >>>
> >>> So, pci_qdev_init() returns -1 when init function returns not 0.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Question: is there a simple way to trigger this error?
> >
> > Next question: what's the contract of PCIDeviceClass method init()?
> > Positive return value feels like bug to me...
>
> I think bypassing the question by converting to realize makes the most
> sense...
>
> Paolo
I'm fine with doing that but Markus's patches wouldn't
yet have solved the problem by themselves since init
is still around, right?
This probably means fixing this bug can't justify
merging the realize patchset after freeze.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-05 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-05 10:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fixed mismatch of error-handling between pci_qdev_init() and qdev SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-05 10:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 12:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-05 13:16 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-05 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 13:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-11-05 14:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-06 2:26 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-06 9:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-06 9:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-06 9:41 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-06 9:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-07 4:17 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-07 7:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-10 8:24 ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-10 8:50 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-05 13:28 ` SeokYeon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141105132815.GA4884@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=syeon.hwang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).