qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amos Kong <kongjianjun@gmail.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>,
	paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, armbru@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, SeokYeon Hwang <syeon.hwang@samsung.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] error: fixed error_set_errno() to deal with a negative type of os_error.
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 12:49:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141106044903.GA8764@air.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545A07C6.1020001@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1883 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 12:19:34PM +0100, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/05/2014 12:11 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> 
> >>>> +        err->msg = g_strdup_printf("%s: %s", msg1,
> >>>> strerror(abs(os_errno)));
> 
> >> I don't, we really should fix the callers.
> > 
> > Of course I understand, but this patch doesn't make matters worse, as
> > long as there are not systems which have negative values for errno
> 
> POSIX requires all defined errno values to be positive; negative errno
> values are unambiguous as values that will cause strerror() to have to
> generate a message about an unknown value.
> 
> > (which I think we generally assume not to exist throughout qemu). That's
> > why I'm fine with it. We should fix the callers but I don't see why we
> > shouldn't apply this patch as well.
> 
> This patch is a bandaid; it makes it harder to find callers that need to
> be fixed.  I'd almost argue the exact opposite - add an assert(os_errno
> > 0).  Then we'd loudly break on broken callers, making them easier to find.

Agree! use an assert to teach the caller ;)

> > A similar issue already came up and led to commit b276d2499, where
> > callers of error_setg_errno() assumed that it would not clobber errno,
> > so we fixed some of the callers but also applied that commit which just
> > saves errno because there's no reason not to.
> 
> If we're willing to accept the convenience so that callers can be lazy,
> then I like this patch.  If we want to fix bugs in the callers, then
> this patch makes it harder to find those bugs.
> 
> I'm actually 60:40 in favor of this patch (I think the convenience
> outweighs an audit of fixing all callers); but if we do that, then we
> might also want to intentionally switch existing callers to pass
> negative values rather than declaring that passing a negative value is a
> bug.

-- 
			Amos.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-06  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-05  8:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] error: fixed error_set_errno() to deal with a negative type of os_error SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-05  8:12 ` Max Reitz
2014-11-05 10:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 11:11     ` Max Reitz
2014-11-05 11:19       ` Eric Blake
2014-11-06  4:49         ` Amos Kong [this message]
2014-11-05 12:44       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-05 13:13         ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-05 13:29         ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-06  2:02         ` SeokYeon Hwang
2014-11-06  9:25           ` Markus Armbruster
2014-11-07  2:26             ` SeokYeon Hwang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141106044903.GA8764@air.redhat.com \
    --to=kongjianjun@gmail.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=bonzini@gnu.org \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=syeon.hwang@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).