From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40848)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1Xo6vC-0006mo-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:35:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1Xo6v6-0001Zd-Ae
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:35:30 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56062)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <imammedo@redhat.com>) id 1Xo6v6-0001ZW-3b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:35:24 -0500
Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAB8ZN7q032030
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=FAIL)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 03:35:23 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:35:20 +0100
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20141111093520.3f589fe1@nial.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5460FC4E.6000501@redhat.com>
References: <1415636450-18674-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
	<5460F87C.6050209@redhat.com>
	<20141110184848.6842474e@nial.usersys.redhat.com>
	<5460FC4E.6000501@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.2] pc: acpi: mark all possible CPUs
 as enabled in SRAT
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:56:30 +0100
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 10/11/2014 18:48, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> > Does this need to be specific to pc-2.2?
> > Why not, It's bug fix.
> > But I don't care if it's merged later.
> 
> No, I mean can you do it also for pc-2.1 and earlier?  Or should it be
> only for the last machine type?
> 
> Paolo
As Michael sad it's for all machine types or have you meant 2.1 stable
branch? My thought was that it's closed now.

I've tested it with RHEL6-7x64 and xp3,Windows server 2003-2012R2x64.
So far no regression was noticed.