From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XoCSB-0002xh-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:30:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XoCS6-0001zK-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:29:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XoCS6-0001z5-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:29:50 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sABETmWX005412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:29:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:29:45 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20141111152945.61324a09@nial.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5461EE16.9030101@redhat.com> References: <1415636450-18674-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> <5460F87C.6050209@redhat.com> <20141110184848.6842474e@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <5460FC4E.6000501@redhat.com> <20141111093520.3f589fe1@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <5461EE16.9030101@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.2] pc: acpi: mark all possible CPUs as enabled in SRAT List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:08:06 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 11/11/2014 09:35, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > > > No, I mean can you do it also for pc-2.1 and earlier? Or should it be > > > only for the last machine type? > > > > As Michael sad it's for all machine types or have you meant 2.1 stable > > branch? My thought was that it's closed now. > > I meant pc-2.1. But if you and Michael agree, it's fine to have it > there as well. It should be safe, any migrated old machine will use original SRAT unit reboot, after that it will pickup fixed table. Scope is limited to -numa + cpu_hotplug guests, for other configurations SRAT will stay the same. > > 2.1 stable branch should be open until 2.1.3 is released, shortly after > 2.2.0. 2.1.2 was unplanned, so there should be a .3 release like we had > 2.1.3. > > Hmm, http://wiki.qemu.org/index.php?title=Planning/2.1 disagrees. No > big deal. > > Paolo > > > I've tested it with RHEL6-7x64 and xp3,Windows server 2003-2012R2x64. > > So far no regression was noticed. >