From: Frank Blaschka <blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "peter.maydell@linaro.org" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Frank Blaschka <frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com>,
"james.hogan@imgtec.com" <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"borntraeger@de.ibm.com" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
"rth@twiddle.net" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] s390: implement pci instructions
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:34:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112143435.GA38044@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54632A03.6050403@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:36:03AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2014 10:22, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>> Absolutely lets make an example for qemu running on BE and LE
> >>>>
> >>>> byte order config space backing pci_default_read_config pcilg (with cpu_to_le)
> >>>> BE 0x78563412 0x12345678 0x78563412
> >>>> LE 0x78563412 0x78563412 0x78563412
> >>>
> >>> No, pci_default_read_config() always returns 0x12345678 because it
> >>> returns a register, not memory.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You mean implementation of pci_default_read_config is broken?
> >> If it should return a register it should not do "return le32_to_cpu(val);"
> >
> > It has to, to convert from memory (after memcpy) to an actual register
> > value. Look at the value list in Paolo's email - I really have no idea
> > how to explain it any better.
>
> pci_default_read_config is reading from a *device* register, and has
> absolutely zero knowledge of the host CPU endianness.
>
> Another way to explain that the result of pci_default_read_config is
> independent of the host endianness, is that the function is basically
> doing this:
>
> switch (len) {
> case 1: return d->config[address];
> case 2: return ldw_le_p(&d->config[address)]);
> case 4: return ldl_le_p(&d->config[address)]);
> default: abort();
> }
>
> So if you want to make the outcome big endian, you have to swap
> unconditionally.
>
> Paolo
Hi Paolo, Alex,
thx a lot for all the explanation and patience.
I think I have understand your point now. I will change the code to
unconditional swap. I feel I had a knowledge gap regarding running guest and
host which different byte orders. Hope this gap is filled now ;)
Frank
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-10 14:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] add PCI support for the s390 platform Frank Blaschka
2014-11-10 14:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] s390: Add PCI bus support Frank Blaschka
2014-11-10 15:14 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-18 12:50 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-18 17:00 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-25 10:11 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-25 12:14 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-25 12:43 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-10 14:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] s390: implement pci instructions Frank Blaschka
2014-11-10 15:56 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-11 12:10 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-11 12:16 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-11 12:39 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-11 12:51 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-11 14:08 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-11 15:24 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-12 8:49 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-12 9:08 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-12 9:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-12 9:13 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-12 9:19 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-12 9:22 ` Alexander Graf
2014-11-12 9:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-12 14:34 ` Frank Blaschka [this message]
2014-11-11 12:17 ` Peter Maydell
2014-11-11 12:40 ` Frank Blaschka
2014-11-10 14:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] kvm: extend kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route to work on s390 Frank Blaschka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112143435.GA38044@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=blaschka@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=frank.blaschka@de.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).