From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqf4y-0002bV-Ml for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:28:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqf4s-00088F-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:28:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqf4s-00088A-Cy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:28:02 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAI9S1i4005115 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 04:28:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:27:59 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20141118092759.GA20230@redhat.com> References: <1415785203-26938-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20141118090134.GB9190@grmbl.mre> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141118090134.GB9190@grmbl.mre> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] migration: fix CVE-2014-7840 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 02:31:34PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Wed) 12 Nov 2014 [11:44:35], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This patchset fixes CVE-2014-7840: invalid > > migration stream can cause arbitrary qemu memory > > overwrite. > > First patch includes the minimal fix for the issue. > > Follow-up patches on top add extra checking to reduce the > > chance this kind of bug recurs. > > > > Note: these are already (tentatively-pending review) > > queued in my tree, so only review/ack > > is necessary. > > Any more acks for this? Dave? > > Also, Michael agreed to just push patch 1 for now, and 2-4 can go in > later (2.3)? Michael, is that fine with you? > > > Amit I'm fine with putting them off. Someone wants to take them or should I? -- MST