From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49650)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Xr7H1-0001Ze-BF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:34:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Xr7Gs-0005K0-LQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:34:27 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55839)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Xr7Gs-0005Jm-F7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:34:18 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:34:12 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20141119153412.GA28556@redhat.com>
References: <1416254843-16859-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<20141119073114.GF9190@grmbl.mre>
	<CAFEAcA-_Uf3yJzJH7k6KvtxQ=iyyyxJ6rUJiZ0O59jgJZaQidg@mail.gmail.com>
	<546CAC13.7060701@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <546CAC13.7060701@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] pc: make ROMs resizeable
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19/11/2014 14:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > It certainly seems pretty risky to introduce this change with
> > only two weeks to go til release; I wouldn't want to merge it
> > without a strong consensus from everybody involved that it
> > really needed to go in for 2.2.
> 
> I think there's consensus (you, Amit, me) that it should wait for 2.3.
> 
> Paolo

I agree too.
We can still iterate on it, and I'd like to merge early in 2.3 cycle.
So please send comments.