From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtCJU-000557-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:21:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtCJO-00043w-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:21:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtCJO-00043s-NN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:21:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:21:25 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20141125092125.GA4641@noname.redhat.com> References: <1414478736-30064-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1414478736-30064-2-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <547447ED.9030708@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <547447ED.9030708@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qemu-iotests: Speed up make check-block List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: Peter Maydell , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= Am 25.11.2014 um 10:12 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 2014-10-28 at 07:45, Fam Zheng wrote: > >Using /tmp (usually mounted as tmpfs) and cache=writeback, the quick > >group can be quicker. > > > >On my laptop (Lenovo T430s with Fedora 20), this reduces the time from > >50s to 30s. > > > >Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > >--- > > tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh b/tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh > >index 12af731..0b54dbf 100755 > >--- a/tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh > >+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests-quick.sh > >@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ > > cd tests/qemu-iotests > > ret=0 > >-./check -T -qcow2 -g quick || ret=1 > >+TEST_DIR=/tmp/qemu-iotests-quick-$$ ./check -T -qcow2 -g quick -c writeback || ret=1 > > There are (at least) two tests which don't work with -c writeback > (026 and 039), one of them is in the quick group (039). Why not use > -c writethrough? It doesn't make any difference on tmpfs anyway (we > can't omit it because that will break 091). Why use any -c? The default is the fast option writeback, and for those test cases that don't support writeback, something working is chosen instead. Kevin