From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuJ4D-00080W-U7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 05:46:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuJ44-00034w-BN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 05:46:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:65401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XuJ44-00034r-58 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 05:46:16 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a1so8509577wgh.11 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 02:46:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:40:30 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20141128104030.GA13631@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <1416392276-10408-1-git-send-email-tumanova@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141125130115.GD21126@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <5475A890.5060705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5475A890.5060705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Geometry and blocksize support for backing devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ekaterina Tumanova Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Public KVM Mailing List , armbru@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, mihajlov@linux.vnet.ibm.com --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 01:16:48PM +0300, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > On 11/25/2014 04:01 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Ekaterina Tumanova wrote: > >4. Please use scripts/checkpatch.pl to check coding style. > > > I did :) You are right, checkpatch.pl doesn't complain. That's weird, I thought there were a few instances that don't follow the QEMU coding style. Either I was wrong or checkpatch.pl is incomplete. Stefan --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUeFEeAAoJEJykq7OBq3PIf0MIAK9lBZDzGE2/NOH40e2dLqSP r0SuCDJSQQEGMtxWn/d7QhbU5yDf7AaNvTitEUn45MWIRW6ihAqlPpyqCWuqnqib kXA0zEKjGYnAfKqRBU8om5CR6oxOw4X2wjbia60mzZpFnDrCH/b7RMbogXFJFWMa hF1QeOC3gwfZ35qZ+KIfI0O+/1t9esa6QshYbz/GbFcdVMONkHwNm7kBs6+bdBVU MDOxg9nVShiSEZK+kYEnDoXA/qohHpmZLqBzY1afsVmTg52fJouhqZOObNC8kBMu Ggq/4DMU1AKZ24jA7BPtHmTJMPdO7tGuWwi0kPzso3lfzFLFn2L74MBw8jIssR8= =5Gvm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--