From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvkop-0004nO-PP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:36:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvkoj-00006X-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:36:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvkoj-00006I-DK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:36:25 -0500 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sB2AaO9g013836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 05:36:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:36:22 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20141202103622.GE7283@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <1417505957-2666-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <87egsitpzx.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87egsitpzx.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 0/6] vmdk: A few small fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Am 02.12.2014 um 09:28 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben: > Fam Zheng writes: > > > Here are some improvements on miscellaneous things such as CID generation, > > comments, input validation. > > > > Fam Zheng (6): > > vmdk: Use g_random_int to generate CID > > vmdk: Fix comment to match code of extent lines > > vmdk: Clean up descriptor file reading > > vmdk: Check descriptor file length when reading it > > vmdk: Remove unnecessary initialization > > vmdk: Set errp on failures in vmdk_open_vmdk4 > > > > block/vmdk.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > The last one could be a candidate for stable. > > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster Thanks, applied to block-next. Kevin