From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvl9J-00043o-HN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:57:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvl9E-0000NY-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:57:41 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xvl9E-0000NK-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:57:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:57:27 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20141202105727.GG7283@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <1417099720-16428-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <1417099720-16428-4-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1417099720-16428-4-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 03/13] block/vvfat: qcow driver may not be found List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: Peter Lieven , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi , Markus Armbruster Am 27.11.2014 um 15:48 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > Although virtually impossible right now, bdrv_find_format("qcow") may > fail. The vvfat block driver should heed that case. > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz I wonder what the subtle breakage would be that we would get if we changed this from qcow1 to qcow2... Kevin