qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: amulya.lokesha@emc.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhdx: Return true for bdrv_has_zero_init
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:34:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141205143404.GA2433@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141205114922.GC6040@noname.str.redhat.com>

On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:49:22PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 05.12.2014 um 11:26 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> > Like for most other image formats, vhdx images read as all zero in qemu
> > after their creation (we're taking advantage from the fact that qemu has
> > just created the image, because PAYLOAD_BLOCK_NOT_PRESENT actually means
> > undefined rather than zeroed according to the spec).
> > 
> > This fixes that 'qemu-img convert' to vhdx fully populates the image.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> 
> Jeff, another thing that Max found while we looked at the spec is that
> the 1.0 spec defines PAYLOAD_BLOCK_UNMAPPED as 3, but we define it as 5.
> It appears that the 0.95 spec actually had it that way.
> 
> Should we handle both 3 and 5 as unmapped?
> 

Wow - you are right, I checked the 1.0 spec change history. Since one
of the valid actions is to read zeros for PAYLOAD_BLOCK_UNMAPPED, it
would seem safe to do that for a technically undefined state of '5',
especially since that will maintain backwards compatibility of
0.95-spec images.  So I think 'yes'.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-05 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-05 10:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vhdx: Return true for bdrv_has_zero_init Kevin Wolf
2014-12-05 11:06 ` Max Reitz
2014-12-05 11:07 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-12-05 14:35   ` Jeff Cody
2014-12-05 11:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-12-05 14:34   ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2015-10-23 15:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-10-23 16:00   ` Kevin Wolf
2015-10-26 10:43     ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141205143404.GA2433@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jcody@redhat.com \
    --cc=amulya.lokesha@emc.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).