qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, andrey@xdel.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	dslutz@verizon.com, batuzovk@ispras.ru
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] serial: clean up THRE/TEMT handling
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:21:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141215152125.GG5502@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548ECE05.3050009@redhat.com>

* Paolo Bonzini (pbonzini@redhat.com) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/12/2014 12:40, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> >      do {
> >> > +        assert(!(s->lsr & UART_LSR_TEMT));
> >> > +        assert(!(s->lsr & UART_LSR_THRE));
> >> > +
> >> >          if (s->tsr_retry <= 0) {
> >> >              if (s->fcr & UART_FCR_FE) {
> >> > -                if (fifo8_is_empty(&s->xmit_fifo)) {
> >> > -                    return FALSE;
> >> > -                }
> >> > +                assert(!fifo8_is_empty(&s->xmit_fifo));
> > That's undoing dslutz@verizon.com's 
> > 
> > dffacd46 - Fix emptyness checking
> > 
> > See, http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/262412
> > I don't think your assumptions are safe because of that qemu_chr_fe_add_watch.
> 
> I think it's safe because:
> 
> - serial_xmit is called from outside only after resetting TEMT and THRE
> and pushing a character on the FIFO

Are you sure about TEMT? My reading of serial_ioport_write is that if
!FCR_FE then TEMT isn't cleared.

> - serial_xmit iterates a second time over do...while() only if the FIFO
> is not empty (both before and after this patch; this patch only changes
> the condition that is used)
> 
> - if qemu_chr_fe_add_watch is called, the next call will have tsr_retry
> >= 1 and thus the "if" would be skipped.
> 
> Note that in the middle we had commit f702e62 (serial: change retry
> logic to avoid concurrency, 2014-07-11) that fixed some messy behavior
> of qemu_chr_fe_add_watch.  The commit message talks about multiple calls
> to qemu_chr_fe_add_watch triggering s->tsr_retry >= MAX_XMIT_RETRY but
> this is not the only possible failure.  If you have multiple calls, the
> subsequent ones will see s->tsr_retry == 0 and will find (s->lsr &
> UART_LSR_THRE) != 0 on entry.  But this should really never happen.
> 
> (Thanks for making me think more about it. :))

Ah yes, that changed things around a lot.

Dave

> 
> Paolo
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-15 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-12 12:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] serial fixes, including 2.2->2.1 migration Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-12 12:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] serial: reset thri_pending on IER writes with THRI=0 Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 10:46   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-15 11:51     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 13:30       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-15 13:34         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 13:37           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-15 13:45             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-12 12:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] serial: clean up THRE/TEMT handling Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 11:40   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-15 12:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 15:21       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2014-12-15 15:26         ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 15:29           ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-12 12:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] serial: update LSR on enabling/disabling FIFOs Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 15:50   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-15 15:52     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-12 12:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] serial: only resample THR interrupt on rising edge of IER.THRI Paolo Bonzini
2014-12-15 16:05   ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2014-12-15 16:10     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141215152125.GG5502@work-vm \
    --to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrey@xdel.ru \
    --cc=batuzovk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=dslutz@verizon.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).