From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1399191] [NEW] Large VHDX image size
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 03:48:25 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150113034825.GD9755@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E290E274B295904D9D81F0BC84559D0B65D6641A9D@MX10A.corp.emc.com
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:33:31PM -0500, Lokesha, Amulya wrote:
> Please find comments inline
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bounces@canonical.com [mailto:bounces@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Cody
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:11 PM
> To: Lokesha, Amulya
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1399191] [NEW] Large VHDX image size
>
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:30:28PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:31:38PM -0000, AMULYA L wrote:
> > > Public bug reported:
> > >
> > > We are trying to convert a VMDK image to VHDX image for deploy
> > > to HyperV Server ( SCVMM 2012 SP1) using qemu-img. We tried
> > > converting the image using both 'fixed' as well as 'dynamic'
> > > format. We found that both the disks occupy the same size of
> > > 50GB. When the same is done with VHD image, we found that the
> > > dynamic disks are much lesser in size (5 GB) than the fixed disk
> > > (50GB).
> > >
> > > Why is that the VHDX generates large sized images for both the
> > > formats?
> > >
> > > The following commands were used to convert the vmdk image to
> > > VHDX format
> >
> > Jeff, did you fix this recently in commit
> > 85b712c9d5b873562c864e72f69cbf0d87d2fe40 ("block: vhdx - set
> > .bdrv_has_zero_init to bdrv_has_zero_init_1")?
> >
> > Stefan
>
>
> Yes, although there has been a report that there are issues in the
> resulting vhdx image in a MS server, after this patch. I am going
> to test and fix (if confirmed) once my MSDN subscription is renewed
> (in process now, I expect it anytime).
>
> Jeff
>
> --
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Could you please give us a possible timeline of when fix will be
> available. Our customers are waiting on this as we are blocked with
> the image creation.
>
> Thanks, Amulya
Hi Amulya,
I have my MSDN stuff sorted out now, so give me a day or two get my
test machine up and running & testing.
-Jeff
>
>
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399191
>
> Title:
> Large VHDX image size
>
> Status in QEMU:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> We are trying to convert a VMDK image to VHDX image for deploy to HyperV Server ( SCVMM 2012 SP1) using qemu-img.
> We tried converting the image using both 'fixed' as well as 'dynamic' format. We found that both the disks occupy the same size of 50GB. When the same is done with VHD image, we found that the dynamic disks are much lesser in size (5 GB) than the fixed disk (50GB).
>
> Why is that the VHDX generates large sized images for both the
> formats?
>
> The following commands were used to convert the vmdk image to VHDX
> format
>
> 1. qemu-img convert -p -o subformat=fixed -f vmdk -O vhdx Test.vmdk
> Test-fixed.vhdx
>
> qemu-img info Test-fixed.vhdx
> image: Test-fixed.vhdx
> file format: vhdx
> virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes)
> disk size: 50G
> cluster_size: 16777216
>
>
>
> 2. qemu-img convert -p -o subformat=dynamic -f vmdk -O vhdx Test.vmdk Test-dynamic.vhdx
>
> qemu-img info Test-dynamic.vhdx
> image: Test-dynamic.vhdx
> file format: vhdx
> virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes)
> disk size: 50G
> cluster_size: 16777216
>
>
> We tried this with the following version of qemu
> 1. qemu-2.0.0
> 2. qemu-2.1.2
> 3. qemu-2.2.0-rc4
>
>
> Please let us know how to create compact VHDX images using qemu-img.
> Thank you
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1399191/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1399191
Title:
Large VHDX image size
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
We are trying to convert a VMDK image to VHDX image for deploy to HyperV Server ( SCVMM 2012 SP1) using qemu-img.
We tried converting the image using both 'fixed' as well as 'dynamic' format. We found that both the disks occupy the same size of 50GB. When the same is done with VHD image, we found that the dynamic disks are much lesser in size (5 GB) than the fixed disk (50GB).
Why is that the VHDX generates large sized images for both the
formats?
The following commands were used to convert the vmdk image to VHDX
format
1. qemu-img convert -p -o subformat=fixed -f vmdk -O vhdx Test.vmdk
Test-fixed.vhdx
qemu-img info Test-fixed.vhdx
image: Test-fixed.vhdx
file format: vhdx
virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes)
disk size: 50G
cluster_size: 16777216
2. qemu-img convert -p -o subformat=dynamic -f vmdk -O vhdx Test.vmdk Test-dynamic.vhdx
qemu-img info Test-dynamic.vhdx
image: Test-dynamic.vhdx
file format: vhdx
virtual size: 50G (53687091200 bytes)
disk size: 50G
cluster_size: 16777216
We tried this with the following version of qemu
1. qemu-2.0.0
2. qemu-2.1.2
3. qemu-2.2.0-rc4
Please let us know how to create compact VHDX images using qemu-img.
Thank you
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1399191/+subscriptions
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 3:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 13:31 [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1399191] [NEW] Large VHDX image size AMULYA L
2015-01-07 15:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-01-07 15:40 ` Jeff Cody
2015-01-12 4:33 ` AMULYA L
2015-01-13 3:48 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2015-01-19 15:19 ` AMULYA L
2015-01-20 21:10 ` Jeff Cody
2015-01-22 5:20 ` AMULYA L
2015-01-22 16:02 ` Jeff Cody
2015-01-22 17:39 ` Jeff Cody
2015-12-28 2:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1399191] " Jan
2015-12-28 2:14 ` Jan
2015-12-31 4:54 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2016-01-04 17:51 ` Max Reitz
2016-03-10 9:57 ` Jan
2017-11-27 13:45 ` Thomas Huth
2018-01-27 4:17 ` Launchpad Bug Tracker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150113034825.GD9755@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=1399191@bugs.launchpad.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).