From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDJrg-0008M0-ML for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:28:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDJrb-0006Tl-H0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:28:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDJrb-0006Rj-9X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:27:59 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0JLRvRm008144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:27:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:27:55 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150119212755.GB10253@redhat.com> References: <1419437261-21113-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1419437261-21113-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20150119161549.0a4162f3@nial.brq.redhat.com> <54BD25A6.9010502@redhat.com> <20150119181427.30cc7736@nial.brq.redhat.com> <54BD3E5F.4050509@redhat.com> <20150119192957.GA8544@redhat.com> <20150119193347.GA8644@redhat.com> <54BD61C3.2080304@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54BD61C3.2080304@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] pc: append ssdt-misc.dsl to the DSDT List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dgilbert@redhat.com On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:57:55PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 19/01/2015 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> > > so we probably should apply anyway the patch of > >>> > > mine that allows the DSDT size to change; and we probably should pay > >>> > > attention to SSDT, and version it. > > Oh, missed that. > > You mean this: "Add padding after the DSDT"? > > Yes. > > > Right but e.g. Igor's patches likely move RSDT anyway, no? > > Yes, but for future machine types we can be more careful. > > Paolo Yes absolutely, I'm not arguing against these patches. I was merely observing that they probably won't help with the specific problem. -- MST