From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devl <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] quorum: don't share qiov
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:22:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150203092153.GA4488@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CED08C.2080501@cn.fujitsu.com>
Am 02.02.2015 um 02:19 hat Wen Congyang geschrieben:
> On 01/30/2015 09:39 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 30.01.2015 um 09:07 hat Wen Congyang geschrieben:
> >> If the child touches qiov->iov, it will cause unexpected results.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >
> > Any specific child you're thinking of?
> >
> > I think children are not supposed to modify their qiov (which would also
> > fail for init_external qiovs). Perhaps we should have made it const.
>
> NBD client. The qiov will be modified in iov_send_recv():
> nbd_co_writev()
> nbd_client_session_co_writev()
> nbd_co_writev_1()
> nbd_co_send_request()
> qemu_co_sendv()
> qemu_co_sendv_recvv()
> iov_send_recv()
Paolo, I think it's rather surprising that iov_send_recv() modifies its
iov. The modification is undone at the end, so you seem to have
considered that a caller might be reusing it after and you can't "use it
up", but we still get problems with concurrent accesses.
Was it an intentional design decision that iov_send_recv() is the sole
owner of the iov and the caller must duplicate it if it's used elsewhere
concurrently?
Otherwise I would suggest to fix iov_send_recv(), and possibly try and
make all the qiov/iov arguments in the block layer const.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-03 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-30 8:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] quorum: don't share qiov Wen Congyang
2015-01-30 13:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-02-02 1:19 ` Wen Congyang
2015-02-03 9:22 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2015-02-03 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 2:10 ` Wen Congyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150203092153.GA4488@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).