qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devl <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] quorum: don't share qiov
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:22:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150203092153.GA4488@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CED08C.2080501@cn.fujitsu.com>

Am 02.02.2015 um 02:19 hat Wen Congyang geschrieben:
> On 01/30/2015 09:39 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 30.01.2015 um 09:07 hat Wen Congyang geschrieben:
> >> If the child touches qiov->iov, it will cause unexpected results.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> > Any specific child you're thinking of?
> > 
> > I think children are not supposed to modify their qiov (which would also
> > fail for init_external qiovs). Perhaps we should have made it const.
> 
> NBD client. The qiov will be modified in iov_send_recv():
> nbd_co_writev()
>     nbd_client_session_co_writev()
>         nbd_co_writev_1()
>             nbd_co_send_request()
>                 qemu_co_sendv()
>                     qemu_co_sendv_recvv()
>                         iov_send_recv()

Paolo, I think it's rather surprising that iov_send_recv() modifies its
iov. The modification is undone at the end, so you seem to have
considered that a caller might be reusing it after and you can't "use it
up", but we still get problems with concurrent accesses.

Was it an intentional design decision that iov_send_recv() is the sole
owner of the iov and the caller must duplicate it if it's used elsewhere
concurrently?

Otherwise I would suggest to fix iov_send_recv(), and possibly try and
make all the qiov/iov arguments in the block layer const.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-03  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-30  8:07 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] quorum: don't share qiov Wen Congyang
2015-01-30 13:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-02-02  1:19   ` Wen Congyang
2015-02-03  9:22     ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2015-02-03 11:01       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09  2:10         ` Wen Congyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150203092153.GA4488@noname.redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).