From: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Give always priority to unused entries in the qcow2 L2 cache
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:46:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150206134629.GA1775@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150206111807.GA13081@noname.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 870 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > I wanted to measure the actual impact of this, so I modified the
> > current code to implement a quick and dirty LRU algorithm and made
> > some numbers.
>
> Cool, thanks. I think switching to an LRU algorithm is an option
> that might make sense for the general case, so this is something to
> consider.
I'm anyway sharing the implementation in case you want to give it a
look.
> I was going to suggest a test run for a different scenario, like
> with many interleaved sequential reads, but thinking a bit more
> about how to do it so that the eviction algorithm could make a
> significant change, it occurred to me that it might not be all that
> easy (and therefore possibly not practically relevant either).
Yes, that was exactly my point.
Thanks a lot for your comments and quick review,
Berto
[-- Attachment #2: lru.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2819 bytes --]
diff --git a/block/qcow2-cache.c b/block/qcow2-cache.c
index b115549..0dd0676 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-cache.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-cache.c
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
#include "trace.h"
typedef struct Qcow2CachedTable {
- void* table;
- int64_t offset;
- bool dirty;
- int cache_hits;
- int ref;
+ void* table;
+ int64_t offset;
+ bool dirty;
+ unsigned lru_count;
+ int ref;
} Qcow2CachedTable;
struct Qcow2Cache {
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct Qcow2Cache {
struct Qcow2Cache* depends;
int size;
bool depends_on_flush;
+ unsigned max_lru_count;
};
Qcow2Cache *qcow2_cache_create(BlockDriverState *bs, int num_tables)
@@ -228,16 +229,18 @@ int qcow2_cache_empty(BlockDriverState *bs, Qcow2Cache *c)
for (i = 0; i < c->size; i++) {
assert(c->entries[i].ref == 0);
c->entries[i].offset = 0;
- c->entries[i].cache_hits = 0;
+ c->entries[i].lru_count = 0;
}
+ c->max_lru_count = 0;
+
return 0;
}
static int qcow2_cache_find_entry_to_replace(Qcow2Cache *c)
{
int i;
- int min_count = INT_MAX;
+ int min_count = UINT_MAX;
int min_index = -1;
@@ -246,15 +249,9 @@ static int qcow2_cache_find_entry_to_replace(Qcow2Cache *c)
continue;
}
- if (c->entries[i].cache_hits < min_count) {
+ if (c->entries[i].lru_count < min_count) {
min_index = i;
- min_count = c->entries[i].cache_hits;
- }
-
- /* Give newer hits priority */
- /* TODO Check how to optimize the replacement strategy */
- if (c->entries[i].cache_hits > 1) {
- c->entries[i].cache_hits /= 2;
+ min_count = c->entries[i].lru_count;
}
}
@@ -310,17 +307,26 @@ static int qcow2_cache_do_get(BlockDriverState *bs, Qcow2Cache *c,
}
}
- /* Give the table some hits for the start so that it won't be replaced
- * immediately. The number 32 is completely arbitrary. */
- c->entries[i].cache_hits = 32;
+ c->entries[i].lru_count = ++c->max_lru_count;
c->entries[i].offset = offset;
/* And return the right table */
found:
- c->entries[i].cache_hits++;
+ if (c->entries[i].lru_count < c->max_lru_count) {
+ c->entries[i].lru_count = ++c->max_lru_count;
+ }
c->entries[i].ref++;
*table = c->entries[i].table;
+ /* Reset LRU counters before they overflow */
+ if (c->max_lru_count == UINT_MAX) {
+ unsigned f;
+ for (f = 0; f < c->size; f++) {
+ c->entries[f].lru_count = 0;
+ }
+ c->max_lru_count = 0;
+ }
+
trace_qcow2_cache_get_done(qemu_coroutine_self(),
c == s->l2_table_cache, i);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-06 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-05 12:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Give always priority to unused entries in the qcow2 L2 cache Alberto Garcia
2015-02-05 13:48 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05 13:59 ` Alberto Garcia
2015-02-05 14:03 ` Max Reitz
2015-02-05 14:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-02-05 14:42 ` Alberto Garcia
2015-02-06 9:44 ` Alberto Garcia
2015-02-06 11:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-02-06 13:46 ` Alberto Garcia [this message]
2015-02-06 14:09 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150206134629.GA1775@igalia.com \
--to=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).