From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45321) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKlT2-0007Zp-EC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:21:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKlSx-00061c-IP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:21:24 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKlSx-00061U-B5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:21:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:21:15 +0000 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20150209102115.GA31581@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <1420742303-3030-1-git-send-email-freddy77@gmail.com> <20150206165411.GB31443@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3] tests: rtl8139: test timers and interrupt List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Frediano Ziglio Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Fam Zheng , qemu-devel --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 05:07:17PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > 2015-02-06 16:54 GMT+00:00 Stefan Hajnoczi : > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 06:38:23PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > >> Test behaviour of timers and interrupts related to timeouts. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio > >> --- > >> tests/Makefile | 2 +- > >> tests/rtl8139-test.c | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= +++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> This patch was derived from a test I did while implementing timer in > >> rtl8139 code. Now that there is support for integrated testing I conve= rted > >> it. The test was tested on a real NIC. > >> > >> As if it's the first test I wrote I don't know if syntax and details a= re > >> fine. For instance should I remove nop test? Should I split my test? > >> > >> Changed from v2: > >> - style (variable declaration, Perl script not able to spot it) > >> > >> Changed from v1: > >> - style > > > > Thanks, applied to my net tree: > > https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/net >=20 > Hi, > all the comments seems to refer to my patch for testing the card but > from https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/net looks like you > applied Paolo patch. >=20 > Is it expected? Sorry, it didn't make it into last week's net pull request due to a mistake. It will be included in the next net pull request: https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/net Stefan --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU2IobAAoJEJykq7OBq3PI+ikIAK4Lcd1nBW4/jl4QffuofKqg 0IfnLStYqhw31HeLplHpQ6D8Fw+C/JXeraatxsknnJXxQJS+a22rRN4ffBAwfi/G 6Nbum5fH4j1nSU1OxADc1Kpp5I0m+BFYwFLsVsQGEleo8COQ8QTIp51TrzgEoHy6 fMSHiLOqGZFMS3aP/jyZQsdgMnu15LiUxV1ALK9R2GdiXPo0Wuwm48GGc3fQJ6sM BFo4rwppBBsli7uTQhj8rKxmJfVrmQBAD1isyokjdgYjVC5WzUCWuPQXs/Lt1b6X zLOlQCYx3DFp6YtbsH6F3z5x1vRqKI2aHKpuhqoPfFAGrHUZfB2S/sR+DQ9jmPM= =PuMA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--