From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKr4P-0002NQ-8N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:20:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKr4M-0006Iu-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:20:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKr4L-0006In-Qw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:20:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:20:08 +0100 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150209162008.GB7542@redhat.com> References: <1423421482-11619-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <54D87AD8.6060004@redhat.com> <20150209145337.GN30651@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150209145337.GN30651@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] NUMA code cleanup List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hu Tao On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 12:53:37PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:16:08AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > > On 08/02/2015 19:51, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > This cleans up some of the NUMA code: moves declarations to numa.h, rename some > > > functions, and remove some existing code that was inside main(). > > > > > > Eduardo Habkost (7): > > > numa: Move NUMA declarations from sysemu.h to numa.h > > > vl.c: Remove unnecessary zero-initialization of NUMA globals > > > numa: Move NUMA globals to numa.c > > > numa: Make max_numa_nodeid static > > > numa: Move QemuOpts parsing to set_numa_nodes() > > > numa: Rename option parsing functions > > > numa: Rename set_numa_modes() to numa_post_machine_init() > > > > Nice! > > > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > > Thanks! > > Do you think this should go through Michael's tree, like past NUMA > patches, or through yours? kvm tree does not seem appropriate. I can merge this if you wish, let me know. > -- > Eduardo