From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54628)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1YLTtM-0004Sd-1i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:47:33 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1YLTtI-0002Ou-T2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:47:32 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33024)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1YLTtI-0002Op-Le
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:47:28 -0500
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1B9lRFo008401
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=FAIL)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 04:47:27 -0500
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:47:25 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150211094725.GA5572@noname.str.redhat.com>
References: <1423598552-24301-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1423598552-24301-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qcow2: Respect new_block in
	alloc_refcount_block()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Am 10.02.2015 um 21:02 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> Under certain circumstances, making the refcount table grow can result
> in leaking clusters. The first patch fixes at least some of those
> circumstances (maybe there are more, but these are the ones I am aware
> of), and the second patch adds a test case.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>