From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOONc-0005oo-3g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:30:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOONX-000117-It for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:30:48 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YOONX-00010l-BC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 05:30:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:30:33 +0100 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150219103033.GB24587@redhat.com> References: <1424235596-29024-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <54E445F3.3070802@redhat.com> <20150219052036.GE7312@voom.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150219052036.GE7312@voom.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Make i82801b11 and ioh3420 x86 only by default List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: Peter Maydell , Isaku Yamahata , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 04:20:36PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:45:23PM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 18 February 2015 at 16:57, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 18/02/2015 05:59, David Gibson wrote: > > >> that are very unlikely to appear on anything other than > > >> an x86. Therefore this patch gives them their own config options, enabled > > >> only for x86 targets by default. > > > > > > I think it's quite likely that we'll use them, or at least ioh3420, on > > > any PCIe machine. So you probably want to add ioh3420 to arm-softmmu > > > and aarch64-softmmu as well. I don't know about i82801b11, but it > > > doesn't hurt to have it in ARM/AArch64 either. > > > > What's the motivation for narrowing these down to particular > > configs anyway? > > Simply to avoid probably-irrelevant devices showing up in qemu -device > ? And make the binary smaller. -- MST