From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQH4X-00051m-Pr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:06:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQH4T-0005xb-FH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:06:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQH4T-0005xR-7S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 10:06:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:06:41 +0100 From: Andrew Jones Message-ID: <20150224150640.GB5498@hawk.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1423753507-30542-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1423753507-30542-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] tcg-arm: LPAE: fix and extend xn control List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:05:02PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > This series fixes and extends the determination of whether or > not an address is executable for LPAE translations. The main > patch is 4/5, and describes the details in its commit message. > Patches 1-3 prepare for the main patch, and patch 5/5 is a > code cleanup made possible by introducing a new helper function > with the main patch. > > This is actually a second version of [1], now based on Peter's > recent translation regime support. However, as the series > has changed substantially, I'm not calling this 'v2'. I believe > I've addressed all of Peter's comments on that first posting in > this refresh though. > > Tested by booting Linux on mach-virt with cortex-a15 and cortex-a57 > (just up to 'Unable to mount root fs'), and also with a kvm-unit-tests > test. The curious can check out the unit test here [2]. > > Thanks in advance for reviews! > > drew > > [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-01/msg01433.html > [2] https://github.com/rhdrjones/kvm-unit-tests/commit/ee553e4bb795b0150e31c794bf8953dfb08d619a > > Andrew Jones (5): > target-arm: convert check_ap to get_rw_prot > target-arm: enable get_rw_prot to take simple AP > target-arm: add an is_user param to get_rw_prot > target-arm: get_phys_addr_lpae: more xn control > target-arm: apply get_S1prot to get_phys_addr_v6 > > target-arm/helper.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.3 > > > Ping? This isn't a huge priority, but I wouldn't want it to get lost either. Thanks, drew