From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51559)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1YShkR-0002m9-QH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:00:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1YShkJ-0001C8-Rh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:00:11 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47975)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1YShkJ-0001B6-LV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 03:00:03 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:59:47 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150303075947.GA29800@ad.nay.redhat.com>
References: <1423710438-14377-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<1423710438-14377-2-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20150212072117.GB32554@ad.nay.redhat.com>
	<54DC58E6.7060608@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20150212084435.GD32554@ad.nay.redhat.com>
	<54DC7376.9060300@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20150212094432.GA21253@ad.nay.redhat.com>
	<54DC7C39.40101@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20150212102622.GA24218@ad.nay.redhat.com>
	<54F5685F.1040207@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54F5685F.1040207@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/14] docs: block replication's
 description
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Yang Hongyang <yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com>, jsnow@redhat.com, zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>

On Tue, 03/03 15:53, Wen Congyang wrote:
> I test qcow2_make_empty()'s performance. The result shows that it may
> take about 100ms(normal sata disk). It is not acceptable for COLO. So
> I think disk buff is necessary(just use it to replace qcow2).

Why not tmpfs or ramdisk?

Fam