From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45055)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1YT5xh-00017O-3b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 04:51:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1YT5xd-0002Wk-JA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 04:51:29 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36572)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1YT5xd-0002WP-Be
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 04:51:25 -0500
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t249pMTK010447
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=FAIL)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 04:51:23 -0500
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:51:20 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150304095120.GB3465@noname.str.redhat.com>
References: <1424059780-7566-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1424059780-7566-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-blk: Remove the stale FIXME comment
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Am 16.02.2015 um 05:09 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> By default, we have ioeventfd enabled, so the IO request processing is
> in IO thread; in the vcpu thread, guest mode is returned to as quickly
> as possible, and completion is delivered via irqfd. Therefore this
> comment from the initial implementation is barely relevant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>

Thanks, applied to the block branch.

Kevin